<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>robert hart photography &#187; Image tampering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roberthart.com/blog/category/image-tampering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roberthart.com/blog</link>
	<description>Discourse about photography, the Web and life its ownself</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:56:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Prince back in court</title>
		<link>http://roberthart.com/blog/prince-back-in-court/</link>
		<comments>http://roberthart.com/blog/prince-back-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image tampering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roberthart.com/blog/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Appropriationist&#8221; Richard Prince is back in court. This time he&#8217;s being sued for copyright infringement in New York District Court by French photographer, Patrick Cariou, for having lifted photographs from his book, &#8220;Yes Rasta.&#8221; This Wall Street Journal article gets at what constitutes &#8220;transformative&#8221; &#8212; the use of an original to create another work in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Appropriationist&#8221; <a href="http://www.richardprinceart.com/cowboys.html">Richard Prince</a> is back in court. This time he&#8217;s being sued for copyright infringement in New York District Court by French photographer, Patrick Cariou, for having lifted photographs from his book, &#8220;Yes Rasta.&#8221;</p>
<p><img src="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-DA531_artlaw_DV_20090128174018.jpg" alt="Richard Prince's "Inquisition" uses images copied from Patrick Cariou's 2000 Book "Yes Rasta"" /></p>
<p>This <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123319795753727521.html?mod=rss_Lifestyle">Wall Street Journal</a> article gets at what constitutes &#8220;transformative&#8221; &#8212; the use of an original to create another work in a different medium.</p>
<p>As Daniel Grant&#8217;s story points out, the law is gray, particularly in light of the ease with which images can be copied and/or downloaded from the Internet.</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roberthart.com/blog/prince-back-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo tampering&#8211;old school</title>
		<link>http://roberthart.com/blog/photo-tampering-old-school/</link>
		<comments>http://roberthart.com/blog/photo-tampering-old-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image tampering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roberthart.com/blog/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And you thought image tampering came about with the advent of Adobe Photoshop? Quite the contrary&#8211;it&#8217;s as old as photography itself. While digital imaging software has certainly made tampering easier and more accessible, the practice of altering photographs was alive and well in photographer Mathew Brady&#8217;s time. Here at top is a photo of General [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.roberthart.com/editorial/img/grant1.jpg" alt="Grant and his generals, minus one." /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.roberthart.com/editorial/img/grant2.jpg" alt="Grant and his generals, the altered image." /></p>
<p>And you thought image tampering came about with the advent of Adobe Photoshop?</p>
<p>Quite the contrary&#8211;it&#8217;s as old as photography itself. While digital imaging software has certainly made tampering easier and more accessible, the practice of altering photographs was alive and well in photographer <a href="http://www.npg.si.edu/exh/brady/art/artdoc.htm" target=new>Mathew Brady&#8217;s</a> time.</p>
<p>Here at top is a photo of General Ulysses S. Grant and his generals, well almost. General Blair, at far right, was added later (bottom photo). Notice too how the background changes and the table or pedestal at far left in the foreground disappears in the bottom photo.</p>
<p>This <a href="http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering" target=new>excellent research paper</a> from <a href="http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/group.html" target=new>Dartmouth&#8217;s Image Science Group</a> provides multiple examples and demonstrates that deception in photography was alive and well 142 years ago.</p>
<p>While photography is less than 200 years old, deception is eternal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roberthart.com/blog/photo-tampering-old-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

